Case studies

Four investor journeys.

Every real Australian portfolio maps onto the same four-stage arc. These are the modelled paths of four investors at different points on the map. Numbers are illustrative and drawn from real archetypes.

All numbers modelled in the tool. Not predictions, not personal advice.
STAGE 1Foundation0-1 propertyView story ↓ STAGE 2Acceleration2-4 propertiesView story ↓ STAGE 3Consolidation5+ propertiesView story ↓ STAGE 4TransitionSelling down to incomeView story ↓

Click a stage to jump to that investor's story.

STAGE 1 FOUNDATION1 property
SR
Sam & Rachel
Stage 1 Foundation
Ages 32 & 30
Combined income $215k
Sydney PPOR $1.2M
Deposit saved $95k
First investment. Cautious.

In this modelled example, the first purchase changes year-10 equity by $280k.

Sam and Rachel had been saving for their first investment for three years and were stuck between a Sydney unit and a regional QLD house. At identical assumed growth rates the model showed the same $95k deposit in a $600k Ipswich house producing $280k more modelled equity by year 10 than a $500k Marrickville unit. Modelled cashflow drag was $340/month vs $190/month.

$95k
Deposit
$600k
Purchase
5.2%
Gross yield
$1.9M
Equity y10 modelled

What the tracker showed them

Year 1Modelled purchase: $600k Ipswich house at an assumed 87% LVR, interest only. Loan settings are model inputs; a broker confirms what a lender allows. Modelled cashflow drag $340/month.
Year 3Modelled equity of $140k at the assumed growth rate. The model tests an equity release toward property 2; a broker confirms any refinance.
Year 5Second property purchased. Combined portfolio $1.4M. Passive income $18k/yr.
Year 10Modelled at the assumed growth rate: portfolio $2.3M gross, $1.9M equity, $52k passive income. Modelled, not predicted.
Composite illustration: the same $95k deposit modelled three ways, side by side.
Composite, not one individual client. Past performance never indicates future results.
STAGE 2 ACCELERATION2 properties
DH
David H.
Stage 2 Acceleration
Age 41
Income $185k
Melbourne PPOR $1.6M
2 investment properties
Post-2025. Reform panic.

Two modelled new-build purchases under the 2026 reforms as announced.

David had two properties bought in 2018 and 2021. The 2026 Budget reforms quarantine negative gearing on established residential acquired after 12 May 2026. In this composite the model compared two new-build purchases with two established purchases under the rules as announced. The modelled 10-year holding-cost difference was $147k (exempt from the negative gearing quarantine) instead of established stock under the post-reform rules. The composite then models a brief for new builds, with modelled purchases in November 2026 and April 2027.

4
Properties
$2.6M
Portfolio
$147k
10yr modelled tax difference
$4.4M
Equity y10 modelled

What the tracker showed him

Nov 2026Purchase 3: $685k Adelaide north house. New build, modelled as exempt from the negative gearing quarantine under the rules as announced. An accountant confirms treatment.
Apr 2027Modelled purchase 4: $720k Brisbane south house, new build, modelled as exempt under the rules as announced. An accountant confirms treatment.
Year 5Portfolio $3.1M. Passive income $65k/yr. Next purchase modelled.
Year 8First commercial acquisition ($850k retail strip). Yield step-up begins.
Composite illustration: a $147k modelled 10-year difference between two new builds and two established purchases, at the assumptions used.
Composite, not one individual client. Past performance never indicates future results.
STAGE 3 CONSOLIDATION3 properties
KL
Kate & Luca
Stage 3 Consolidation
Ages 48 & 46
Combined income $340k
Brisbane PPOR $1.8M
4 investment properties
Serviceability wall. Yield pivot.

Residential borrowing test full. A commercial scenario passes the modelled test.

In this composite, the borrowing test shows no further residential headroom at property 4 under the assumed lender settings. The commercial module modelled a $650k Gatton retail strip with net income $52k on a 12-year lease, cap rate 8.0%, WALE 4.2 years. At these inputs the property covered its own debt in the model. Whether a lender treats it that way is for a broker to confirm.

5
Properties
$3.8M
Portfolio
$78k
Passive/yr y8
70%
LVR commercial

What the tracker showed them

Year 1Modelled commercial retail purchase, Gatton, $650k. Net income $52k. Passes the modelled borrowing test; a broker confirms.
Year 3Rent step-up on lease review +4%. Yield rises to 8.3% on cost.
Year 5Residential 5 acquired ($780k). Portfolio $4.6M. Passive $95k/yr.
Year 10Debt-reduction cycle begins. Consolidation stage. Passive $135k/yr modelled at assumed rents and growth (not a forecast).
Composite illustration: the same portfolio modelled with a residential next step and with a commercial one, side by side.
Composite, not one individual client. Past performance never indicates future results.
STAGE 4 TRANSITION5+ / commercial
MV
Michael V.
Stage 4 Transition
Age 58
Semi-retired
Perth PPOR $2.4M
8 properties + $1.2M shares
Portfolio built. Now what?

Selling, holding and refinancing can each be modelled side by side.

Michael had spent 22 years building an 8-property portfolio ($6.4M gross, $2.1M debt). The question wasn't how to grow, it was how to convert equity into replacement income against a modelled CGT estimate of $780k if all eight were sold at current values (an accountant confirms). The tracker modelled three scenarios side by side: sell 2 lowest-yielding + pay down debt, sell 4 mid-cycle + retire early, or hold + refinance for structured drawdown. Scenario 3 shows the highest modelled lifetime after-tax income at these inputs.

8
Properties
$6.4M
Portfolio gross
$185k
Passive/yr net
$780k
CGT if sold now

What the tracker showed him

Scenario ASell 2 lowest-yield, pay down $780k debt. Passive net $164k/yr from y2.
Scenario BSell 4, retire fully. CGT bill $520k. Passive net $148k/yr from cash + shares.
Scenario CModelled: hold all, with an assumed $600k refinance drawdown. Passive net $185k + $50k drawdown = $235k/yr modelled. A broker confirms lending.
ChoseScenario C. Modelled through to age 75. Estate planning conversation now with accountant.
Composite illustration: three scenarios modelled side by side, then handed to an accountant to interpret.
Composite, not one individual client. Past performance never indicates future results.

Which stage are you on?

The tracker calculates from your numbers. Foundation to Retirement, the same map.

Open the tracker free See how it works